Blatant tanking to get slightly less valuable for some NBA t

Blatant tanking to get slightly less valuable for some NBA t

Postautor: lucky » 29 wrz 2017, o 09:06

Flattening the odds in the NBA's draft lottery, a change Jeff Bagwell Womens jersey passed Thursday by an overwhelming 28-1-1 vote of team owners, will not end tanking and may not reduce it much. The league knows that; it repeatedly characterized the proposal as "an incremental step" toward more potential tweaks, sources say. The NBA is concerned about egregious tanking from teams that are already awful -- the sort of tanking that generates think pieces and angry tweets. The reform seeks to accomplish that by cutting the odds that the worst teams win the best picks. Under the current system, the worst team has a 25 percent chance of nabbing the top pick. The second-worst team has a 19.9 percent shot. Starting in 2019, the three worst teams will have an equal 14 percent chance at the most coveted asset in basketball. The very best team in the lottery will have the same miniscule 0.5 percent chance of skyrocketing to the top of the draft, and the same paltry chance of landing in the top three. The teams in the middle each get a big probability bump. This is a less dramatic version of a flattening proposal that failed in 2014 amid resistance from small-market teams that feared it nipped away at their only path to acquiring superstars. That fear remains in some corners, including (presumably) in Oklahoma City, the only franchise to vote no -- and one that, as the Sonics, tanked for stars. In other news: Russell Westbrook has still not signed his extension. The league has a legitimate interest in its worst teams not feeling as if they have to get any more embarrassingly bad in order to secure improved lottery odds. The NBA does not want to relive Trust The Process, even though the Marcus Semien Womens jersey architect of the most aggressive -- and most coldly rational -- multiyear tank job in league history was ousted precisely because of the scheme's naked aggression. It would kindly prefer the Suns not send Eric Bledsoe home for two months; new rest regulations, also approved Thursday, may take care of that. Reform may change team behavior on the fringes. Bledsoe types may play more. The next version of the Sixers might be more open to signing a couple of stable veterans, even at the "risk" of winning a couple more games. April basketball will be a little less bad. But there will still be bad teams, and bad teams will still have reason to lose games. Some less-bad teams might have even more reason to lose games, especially late in the season. No league can legislate away rebuilding. Wins are a zero-sum game. A reverse-order draft, even one warped a bit by lottery odds, encourages losing. As long as the best young players go to a subset of teams at the bottom of the league, those teams will chase high picks. You could argue that the league shouldn't have a reverse-order draft at all. Some of my colleagues, including the estimable Kevin Arnovitz, have argued for the abolition of the draft. Mike Zarren, assistant GM of the Celtics, proposed a complex wheel system in which teams semi-randomly rotate between all 30 draft slots year-by-year. Some have argued the best teams should select first as a way to incentivize winning, or that all 30 teams should participate in a lottery with equal odds of landing in any spot. Whether you prefer those solutions or not -- I don't, though the wheel intrigues -- they would actually eradicate tanking by snapping the connection between team record and draft position. That is the sort of systematic overhaul Authentic Kevin Kiermaier Youth jersey it takes. "I don't know what the final solution is," Mark Cuban, the Mavs' owner, told me in 2014, when the last attempt at lottery reform bit the dust. "But I don't think only changing the draft will be the ultimate answer." Teams tank for many reasons. A lot are organic, the product of an inevitable rise-and-fall cycle to which none -- not even the Spurs, tankers for Tim Duncan -- are immune. They tank because in basketball more than any sport, singular superstars drive winning, and the only fail-safe way to get one is to draft very high in the right year. That is the best way to keep them, too; rookie first-round picks enter the league on four-year, cost-controlled contracts, and then proceed into restricted free agency -- where incumbent teams can match any rival offer. Barring a David Kahn-level snafu, a team that drafts a superstar gets him for seven or eight years. Make good choices during that time, and you should be able to convince that superstar to stay longer. If you want to eliminate tanking, you have to change every part of that system. Shaking one branch of the tree isn't enough. You do things that make superstars more portable -- more available to everyone. Maybe you cut the length of rookie contracts, or eliminate restricted free agency. Maybe you raise the individual player salary limit, so that, say, the Magic could offer Ben Simmons $50 million a season three years from now. Is that kind of league you want, though? Maybe it is. Player freedom of movement is a good and fair thing. Restricted free agency really isn't. But you are crafting an entirely different league, with consequences we can't anticipate. What the league approved today will reduce only a tiny sliver of overall tanking, and that's fine. Rebuilding is natural. The Bobcats reignited the tanking debate in 2011-12, when they went 7-59 after trading away Tyson Chandler, Gerald Wallace and Stephen Jackson from an aging and mediocre team -- and then signing zero meaningful free agents in the summer of 2011.
Posty: 829
Rejestracja: 2 maja 2017, o 10:14

Re: Blatant tanking to get slightly less valuable for some N

Postautor: Jay332843867 » 29 wrz 2017, o 09:43

Party moderate concerns, but also caused the attention of the Kremlin. After she gave a tough speech Nike Air Max 180 in 1976, the Soviet media gave her a nickname: Iron Lady. And she is proud of it However, it turns out that when she sees the opportunity, she will bend over to catch it. At that time, Mikhail S. Gorbachev, the new generation of Soviet leaders, soon took power and became one of the earliest Western leaders to recognize this. So she invited Gorbachev to visit the UK in December 1984. She said at the time, 'I like Mr. Gorbachev, we can work together.' Three months later, Gorbachev became the top Soviet leader. Her good relationship with the new Soviet leader and her friendship with Ronald Reagan made her a connection between the White House and the Kremlin in the intense talks between the US and the Soviet Union on the termination of the arms race in the 1980s. Palace of the key bridge. Nike Air Max Shoes She is both energetic and eloquent, rarely willing to give in, but also hate compromise. The colleagues who disagreed with her were often submerged in the ocean of argument, and at this time a lot of people would say that their people were 'dizzy with Nike Scarpe online their handbags.' In 1999, John O'Sullivan, the Special Adviser to the Prime Minister, recalled that 'her standards are high and she wants everyone to take their jobs, but there is a little difference. The lower the position of the other, the better her attitude. The owner of the grocery store owner On October 13, 1925, Margaret Hilda Roberts was born in Lincolnshire Grantham, 100 miles north of London. Her father, Alfred Roberts, is the son of the shoemaker, a priest of the Methodist Church, a local politician and a grocery store. The family lived in a grocery store with no hot water in the house. Her mother is called Beatrice, her sister is called Muriel. The couple raised Margaret Canada Goose and Muriel, keeping them in line with the doctrine of the Methodist Church: personal responsibility, hard work and traditional morality. Margaret Thatcher learned politics from his father's knees and later took part in his father's election campaign as an independent candidate for magistrate and district board member. 'Politics is flowing in my blood,' she Under Armour Curry said. She won moncler outlet sito ufficiale the Kesteven and Grantham Girls School scholarship. In 1943, 17 years old, she was admitted to the University of Oxford (Oxford) Somerville College (Somerville College), learning chemistry. Since the University of Oxford Debate did not allow girls to join before 1963, the young Mrs. Thatcher joined the Oxford University Conservative Association and became Chairman of the Association in 1946. In 1947, she graduated from Oxford University, after continuing to pursue a master's degree in chemistry, then became a chemical researcher, and began to study the law. Politics had a stronger appeal to her, and at the age of 23 she was elected a Conservative candidate. In 1949, she met Denis Thatcher, a successful businessman. Dennis Thatcher was an artillery officer, who was awarded a medal for his heroic performance during World War II. In December 1951 they became couples. In August 1953, Margaret Thatcher gave birth to a pair of twins, Mark and Carol, and the third generation of their family was still alive. (Sir Dennis died in 2003) In the same year in December, she obtained a lawyer's qualifications, business areas for the patent and tax law. With the rich life of the couple, Margaret Thatcher made the economic independence, Zapatos Nike Shox began to devote themselves to politics. 'The work of the Prime Minister Dr Martens Donna is lonely,' she wrote in the book 'The Downing Street Years' published in 1993, which must be so that she can not be led by the crowd, but with Dennis I'm never alone. In 1964, the scandal, the economic downturn and internal contradictions made the Conservatives exhausted and lost to the Labor Party led by Harold Wilson in the campaign. However, as the recession intensified, trade unions became more radical, and in 1970 Wilson lost to Conservative leader Edward Heath in the general election. Heath vowed to use 'silent revolution' to replace consensus politics, to reduce the role of the UGG Guantes rosado state in the market, and to tame the union. Heath appointed Mrs. Thatcher as Minister of Education. As a Conservative Cabinet minister, she struggled with budget cuts in the UK university system and pushed for the reconstruction of the school system in poor areas, and her enthusiasm 'would make the best socialists eclipsed' in 1989 Hugo Young, author and reporter of the Iron Lady, an important biographer. However, let her famous national is limited to the students to provide free milk initiatives. Although the poor children are not affected by this restriction, and the previous Labor government has reduced the free milk supply to the school, but the opposition has been wanton to attack her. When she defended this Congress in Congress, it was ridiculed by all that helped to fund other more meaningful projects. The tabloid labeled her the 'Thatcher the Milk Snatcher' label. Her children were also mocked at school, her husband worried about her and the children under pressure to persuade h
Posty: 233
Rejestracja: 21 wrz 2017, o 04:10

Wróć do Rozwój mowy

Kto jest online

Użytkownicy przeglądający to forum: Bing [Bot], jokergreen0220 i 11 gości